Do You See What I (Don't) See?
My wife screamed a loud, sharp, “STOP!” I jumped immediately
on the brakes, just as a phantom Chevy Tahoe emerged from nowhere and crossed
our path from right to left. The driver gave me a sidelong look with a clear
indication of his opinion of me. Of course, the Tahoe had been there the entire
time, yet it was all but invisible to me.
Computer aided design, wind tunnel and virtual aerodynamics
modeling, and NTHSA safety ratings have caused what I believe to be a minor
crisis in automotive design. This rigorous process of fuel economy and safety
rating maximalization dictates a generic blob, which the car companies then
“style”. In the search to make their blob stand out from everyone else’s blobs,
the incidental surface decoration of many cars is becoming increasingly
bizarre, e.g. everything Toyota is producing currently. But this relentless
march to the regulator’s tune has a secondary, and worse, effect.
More and more cars are just too damn hard to see out of. Let
us list a few of the culprits, and the regulation which produces them:
increased hood heights (pedestrian impact); higher beltlines (side impact);
thick roof pillars (roll-over protection, airbags); steeply-raked windshields
(fuel economy); massive black boxes between the rear-view mirror and the roof
(active safety systems). Combine these with dirty windows from winter driving,
and you are flying blind.
Let’s return to my own example. I was driving my wife’s 2017
Infiniti QX60 with our 4-week-old baby in the back when I had my near miss. Let
me show you what I see from the driver’s seat:
By my reckoning, clear visibility is only about 25% of the
entire view, with perhaps another 25% in total area partially obscured. Now, I
am fully aware that it is my responsibility to clear the windscreen; but in a
Midwest winter, the grime you see here only takes a few miles to accumulate.
Infiniti gets double demerits for poor windshield wiper design in this
case.
The view out of the back of these cars is getting worse,
too. When I was learning to drive 25 years ago, we were trained to put an arm
around the back of the passenger seat so we could twist around and look out the
back windows. This maneuver worked just fine in everything from our old
Plymouth Voyager minivan to my dad’s Volvo company car.
But the government is here, and they are here to help, in
the form of mandatory backup cameras!
Oh.
Well, I’m glad there’s a giant warning across the top of the
screen, telling me to check my surroundings for safety. Not quite sure how I’d
do that, short of getting out of the car and looking around.
Does it make you feel safer to have to rely on a blind-spot
alert when merging on the highway, because you can no longer look over your
shoulder and see if there is a car in the lane? Is backing out of a space in a
parking lot possible without a cross traffic alert system in your car?
I contend that there is little to no chance an effort will
be made to address the worsening visibility in modern cars. The inexorable
motive force behind the regulatory state is to remove more and more
responsibility from humans and put the machines in charge. Gleeful
prognostications about the coming autonomous future make this obvious. Let’s
give the problem to engineers, they will be smarter than you, for technology is
superior in every way to responsible human judgment.
As in so many other areas of life in our decaying republic,
we cannot allow individuals to take responsibility for their actions, no, we
must make the right choices for them, but still hold them accountable for the
unintended consequences.
Comments